1. Mac Pro For Gaming

The first Geekbench 4 benchmarks are out for Apple’s new “pro” version of the Mac mini, and the best results are at least intriguing: Equipped with an optional six-core 3.2GHz Intel Core i7 processor, a $1,099 Mac mini could go toe-to-toe on CPU performance with Apple’s latest eight-core Mac Pro, a machine that sells for $3,799 and up.

Apple Mac Benchmarks (Mac Geekbench 2, 3 and 4 Results) Per reader requests, average Geekbench 2, 3, and 4 results submitted to the Primate Labs website for each G3 and newer Mac and all iOS devices are organized by category below. Geekbench results also are provided on EveryMac.com's specs pages for G3 and newer Macs and within. User benchmarks for all builds (9 of 10,535,150) Real-world benchmarks submit by owners of all builds. It’s certainly possible to run games on a Mac, but PCs are generally considered better for hard-core gaming. Read more about Mac computers and gaming. The Mac vs PC debate will continue as long as they are the two major choices for hardware and operating systems. Dec 31, 2013  The Mac Pro Review (Late 2013). Gaming Performance. A PC with Mac specifications it's almost more money than just buying a Mac Pro Plus.

Mac vs PC comparison. A PC generally refers to a computer that runs on the Windows operating system. It is also defined as an IBM-compatible computer, thereby meaning that its architecture is based on the IBM microprocessor. Jul 30, 2015  With every new iteration of Windows, many always wonder how the new version stacks in comparison with the old for gaming. In order to know, we tested. Jan 25, 2018  Photoshop Speed Test: Gaming PC vs. IMac Pro, Mac Pro, and MacBook Pro. Jan 25, 2018. Instead of using benchmarks, this test looks at performance in.

Primate Labs’ Geekbench Browser provides access to test results from users around the world, and is often the first place that the processing performance of new computers and devices can be quantified. As of now, there are two results for the “Macmini8,1,” with specs corresponding to one configuration of the just-announced professional update to the Mac mini: an Intel Core i7-8700B CPU running at 3.2GHz with six cores.

Apple’s entry-level Mac mini sells for $799 and features a quad-core 3.6GHz Core i3 with 8GB of DDR4 RAM. The test machine includes 32GB of the same RAM, a $600 upgrade that typically does not impact results.

The first Geekbench result is the strongest, showing a single-core score of 5512, which eclipses all Mac models save for the latest four-core 4.2GHz iMac, plus a multi-core score of 23516. This multi-core number would place the Mac mini at the same general performance level as a mid-range configuration of the Intel Xeon-based Mac Pro, which runs eight cores at 3.0GHz. Apple’s higher-end 12-core Mac Pro and four separate configurations of the iMac Pro all easily outperform the Mac mini, albeit at much higher prices.

But a second, earlier set of results from the same hardware isn’t as impressive, showing a single-core score of 5070 and multi-core score of 16818. As the results were only seven minutes apart, it’s possible that there was some other process running at the same time as the first test, distorting the result. But if the numbers were averaged together, the new Mac mini would be closer in performance to a high-end laptop than a powerful desktop. Further benchmarking and real-world testing will show which is actually the case.

By comparison, early benchmarks for the new Retina MacBook Air are suggesting that Apple’s latest laptop is closer to a 12-inch MacBook than a 13-inch MacBook Pro in performance. That’s not a huge surprise, given the discovery that its Intel Core i5 CPU is only a slightly more powerful version of the chips found in the 12-inch models, now coupled with a fan. Here, the single-core and multi-core scores are both just ahead of the highest-end 1.4GHz MacBook, which scored 3925 and 7567 to the MacBook Air’s 4091 and 7693, respectively.

Apple’s latest MacBook Pro laptops range from 4505 to 5344 in single-core performance, and 8831 to 22556 in multi-core, depending on configuration. With prices starting at $1,299, only $100 more than the base model MacBook Air, they feature better screens, faster processors, and in some cases much better graphics capabilities than the Air, but with slightly thicker and heavier enclosures.

With every new iteration of Windows, many always wonder how the new version stacks in comparison with the old for gaming. In order to know, we tested Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 it with both popular graphics benchmarks and benchmarks included in a few games, in order to give us a spectrum of different situations and see which operating system provides the best performance.

The benchmarks were tested on a recently built system, the same for both operating systems, in the same condition (Windows 10 was updated over Windows 8.1, so even the hard disk drive load is basically the same). Here’s our test hardware:

Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
RAM: 32 GB

Keep in mind that since there aren’t games supporting DirectX 12 at the moment, the test was done in DirectX 11 applications, which is pretty much the point, as we know that DirectX 12 games are supposed to perform much better with Windows 10.

Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward

Everything can change in the future. It leaves more room for new games to be added and prevents the page from becoming too laggy.Note 4: If you want to see what games released in 2015 then past following link in google search bar:click on drop down menu and select 'cached'.This will bring up old version of this thread full of games from previous year (2015).Star CitizenGenre: Space Sim. For Example: When Killing Floor 2 was listed it wasn't announced for PS4 at that time, now it's timed exclusive.Note 3: At the beginning of every year, games that have already released last year are removed.

Windows 8

Windows 10

On the benchmark of the popular Final Fantasy MMORPG, Windows 10 gained over 100 points. It may not be an enormous difference, considering the total score of almost 11,000, but an improvement is an improvement. Interestingly, average loading times also improved by a couple seconds.

Batman: Arkham Knight

Windows 8

Windows 10

Batman: Arkham Knight‘s benchmarking tool also showcased a gain in frame rate with Windows 10: Minimum FPS increased by 1, while both maximum and average FPS increased by 3.

Total War: Attila

Windows 8

Offline game cracking for mac. NMac Ked Download cracked Apple Mac OSX apps & games for free, new and updated apps & games from inside and outside Mac AppStore. Download cracked Apple Mac OSX apps & games for free, new and updated apps & games from inside and outside Mac AppStore.

Windows 10

Total War: Attila is interesting, as it displays an extremely large number of small animated units on the screen. We also get a handy graph. Average FPS increased by 2 with Windows 10, Maximum FPS by 5, and minimum FPS by 2. The frame rate is also visibly more stable on Windows 10, even if there’s a single scene at about 13 seconds where frame rate drops sharply lower than on Windows 8.

By the way, a small public service announcement. If you upgrade your operating system by keeping your data, you will need to verify the game cache on Steam for Total War: Attila and a few other games, or they won’t run.

3D Mark Firestrike

Windows 8

Windows 10

Windows 10 allowed us to gain 70 points in the popular benchmark by Futuremark. Interestingly, it outperformed by a little bit Windows 8 in graphics and combined tests, but it actually slightly underperformed its predecessor in the physics benchmark.

Unigine Valley

Windows 8

Windows 10

Mac Pro For Gaming

The newest benchmark by Unigine, Valley, isn’t only beautiful, but it’s designed to test the graphics card quite brutally. Interestingly, both minimum and maximum FPS were infinitesimally lower (0.2 and 0.1) in Windows 10, but average FPS and overall score were slightly higher (by 0.6 FPS and 22 points), showing a slightly more stable overall performance.

While the true test of Windows 10 will come when DirectX 12 games will start becoming widespread, if you’re worried about the new operating system negatively impacting your gaming experience, we can say that at least on our test machine not only this did not happen, but performance was improved across the board.

While it isn’t an enormous improvement, any gain is a good gain, and combined with how snappy the OS is and with the great features of the Xbox App (that aren’t limited to Xbox One users, as the Game DVR feature is very good even if you’ll never touch a console in your life), I’d definitely advise to do the upgrade. After all, it’s free.